pangolin lineage covid

Because the SARS-CoV-2 S protein has been implicated in past recombination events or possibly convergent evolution12, we specifically investigated several subregions of the Sproteinthe N-terminal domain of S1, the C-terminal domain of S1, the variable-loop region of the C-terminal domain, and S2. Discovery and genetic analysis of novel coronaviruses in least horseshoe bats in southwestern China. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in 874850). Mol. Lam, T. T. et al. Although the human ACE2-compatible RBD was very likely to have been present in a bat sarbecovirus lineage that ultimately led to SARS-CoV-2, this RBD sequence has hitherto been found in only a few pangolin viruses. In other words, a true breakpoint is less likely to be called as such (this is breakpoint-conservative), and thus the construction of a non-recombining region may contain true recombination breakpoints (with insufficient evidence to call them as such). A novel bat coronavirus closely related to SARS-CoV-2 contains natural insertions at the S1/S2 cleavage site of the Spike protein. Mol. 1) and thus likely to be the product of recombination, acquiring a divergent variable loop from a hitherto unsampled bat sarbecovirus28. J. Virol. An initial genomic sequence analysis found that the reemergence of COVID-19 in New Zealand was caused by a SARS-CoV-2 from the (now ancestral) lineage B.1.1.1 of the pangolin nomenclature ( 17 ). We say that this approach is conservative because sequences and subregions generating recombination signals have been removed, and BFRs were concatenated only when no PI signals could be detected between them. B 281, 20140732 (2014). Probable Pangolin Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with the COVID-19 Due to the absence of temporal signal in the sarbecovirus datasets, we used informative prior distributions on the evolutionary rate to estimate divergence dates. 3). These differences reflect the fact that rate estimates can vary considerably with the timescale of measurement, a frequently observed phenomenon in viruses known as time-dependent evolutionary rates41,43,44. It allows a user to assign a SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence the most likely lineage (Pango lineage) to SARS-CoV-2 query sequences. Robertson, D. nCoVs relationship to bat coronaviruses & recombination signals (no snakes) no evidence the 2019-nCoV lineage is recombinant. 95% credible interval bars are shown for all internal node ages. Are you sure you want to create this branch? The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine 1 Phylogenetic relationships in the C-terminal domain (CTD). Virological.org http://virological.org/t/ncovs-relationship-to-bat-coronaviruses-recombination-signals-no-snakes-no-evidence-the-2019-ncov-lineage-is-recombinant/331 (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Variant Classifications and Definitions Li, Q. et al. Biazzo et al. Press, H.) 3964 (Springer, 2009). Hon, C. et al. Coronavirus: Pangolins found to carry related strains. Biol. Next, we (1) collected all breakpoints into a single set, (2) complemented this set to generate a set of non-breakpoints, (3) grouped non-breakpoints into contiguous BFRs and (4) sorted these regions by length. Maciej F. Boni, Philippe Lemey, Andrew Rambaut or David L. Robertson. This dataset comprises an updated version of that used in Hon et al.15 and includes a cluster of genomes sampled in late 2003 and early 2004, but the evolutionary rate estimate without this cluster (0.00175 substitutions per siteyr1 (0.00117,0.00229)) is consistent with the complete dataset (0.00169 substitutions per siteyr1, (0.00131,0.00205)). Concurrent evidence also proposed pangolins as a potential intermediate species for SARS-CoV-2 emergence and suggested them as a potential reservoir species11,12,13. 04:20. PLoS Pathog. the development of viral diversity. Zhang, Y.-Z. Emerg. N. China corresponds to Jilin, Shanxi, Hebei and Henan provinces, and the N. China clade also includes one sequence sampled in Hubei Province in 2004. 87, 62706282 (2013). Google Scholar. DRAGEN COVID Lineage App This app aligns reads to a SARS-CoV-2 reference genome and reports coverage of targeted regions. We demonstrate that the sarbecoviruses circulating in horseshoe bats have complex recombination histories as reported by others15,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. Hu, B. et al. In the absence of any reasonable prior knowledge on the TMRCA of the sarbecovirus datasets (which is required for grid specification in a skygrid model), we specified a simpler constant size population prior. Which animal did the novel coronavirus come from? | Live Science PubMed Across a large region of the virus genome, corresponding approximately to ORF1b, it did not cluster with any of the known bat coronaviruses indicating that recombination probably played a role in the evolutionary history of these viruses5,7. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report 1, 21 January 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020). But some theories suggest that pangolins may be the source of the novel coronavirus. BEAGLE 3: improved performance, scaling, and usability for a high-performance computing library for statistical phylogenetics. [12] Patino-Galindo, J. Membrebe, J. V., Suchard, M. A., Rambaut, A., Baele, G. & Lemey, P. Bayesian inference of evolutionary histories under time-dependent substitution rates. Temporal signal was tested using a recently developed marginal likelihood estimation procedure41 (Supplementary Table 1). Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma lineage introduction and COVID-19 - Nature matics program called Pangolin was developed. 5). Specifically, using a formal Bayesian approach42 (see Methods), we estimate a fast evolutionary rate (0.00169 substitutions per siteyr1, 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval (0.00131,0.00205)) for SARS viruses sampled over a limited timescale (1year), a slower rate (0.00078 (0.00063,0.00092) substitutions per siteyr1) for MERS-CoV on a timescale of about 4years and the slowest rate (0.00024 (0.00019,0.00029) substitutions per siteyr1) for HCoV-OC43 over almost five decades. By 2009, however, rapid genomic analysis had become a routine component of outbreak response. 35, 247251 (2018). The coronavirus genome that these researchers had assembled, from pangolin lung-tissue samples, contained some gene regions that were ninety-nine per cent similar to equivalent parts of the SARS . 4 TMRCAs for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Global epidemiology of bat coronaviruses. 24, 490502 (2016). The virus then. The Artic Network receives funding from the Wellcome Trust through project no. Mol. Anderson, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C. & Garry, R. F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Pango lineage designation and assignment using SARS-CoV-2 - PubMed It is RaTG13 that is more divergent in the variable-loop region (Extended Data Fig. The extent of sarbecovirus recombination history can be illustrated by five phylogenetic trees inferred from BFRs or concatenated adjacent BFRs (Fig. Dudas, G., Carvalho, L. M., Rambaut, A. 3). In addition, sequences NC_014470 (Bulgaria 2008), CoVZXC21, CoVZC45 and DQ412042 (Hubei-Yichang) needed to be removed to maintain a clean non-recombinant signal in A. Wang, L. et al. Of the countries that have contributed SARS-CoV-2 data, 30% had genomes of this lineage. B.W.P. Duchene, S., Holmes, E. C. & Ho, S. Y. W. Analyses of evolutionary dynamics in viruses are hindered by a time-dependent bias in rate estimates. More evidence Pangolin not intermediary in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 This study provides an integration of existing classifications and describes evolutionary trends of the SARS-CoV . 1c). Virus Evol. Open reading frames are shown above the breakpoint plot, with the variable-loop region indicated in the Sprotein. Evolutionary rate estimation can be profoundly affected by the presence of recombination50. Cov-Lineages 92, 433440 (2020). This produced non-recombining alignment NRA3, which included 63 of the 68genomes. These authors contributed equally: Maciej F. Boni, Philippe Lemey. 21, 15081514 (2015). (Yes, Pango is a tongue-in-cheek reference to pangolins, which were briefly suspected to have had a role in the coronavirus's originseveral of the team's computational tools are named after. Using both prior distributions, this results in six highly similar posterior rate estimates for NRR1, NRR2 and NRA3, centred around 0.00055 substitutions per siteyr1. Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. Eight other BFRs <500nt were identified, and the regions were named BFRAJ in order of length. Time-measured phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using a Bayesian approach implemented in BEAST42 v.1.10.4. 4). 94, e0012720 (2020). EPI_ISL_410538, EPI_ISL_410539, EPI_ISL_410540, EPI_ISL_410541 and EPI_ISL_410542) for the use of sequence data via the GISAID platform. Accurate estimation of ages for deeper nodes would require adequate accommodation of time-dependent rate variation. Softw. 3 Priors and posteriors for evolutionary rate of SARS-CoV-2. & Muhire, B. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. A reduced sequence set of 25sequences chosen to capture the breadth of diversity in the sarbecoviruses (obvious recombinants not involving the SARS-CoV-2 lineage were also excluded) was used because GARD is computationally intensive. Our approach resulted in similar posterior rates using two different prior means, implying that the sarbecovirus data do inform the rate estimate even though a root-to-tip temporal signal was not apparent. P.L. 68, 10521061 (2019). In December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases epidemiologically linked to an open-air live animal market in the city of Wuhan (Hubei Province), China1,2 led local health officials to issue an epidemiological alert to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organizations (WHO) China Country Office. All three approaches to removal of recombinant genomic segments point to a single ancestral lineage for SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13. 23, 18911901 (2006). All custom code used in the manuscript is available at https://github.com/plemey/SARSCoV2origins. A hypothesis of snakes as intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2 was posited during the early epidemic phase54, but we found no evidence of this55,56; see Extended Data Fig. In case of DRAGEN COVID Lineage tool, the minimum accepted alignment score was set to 22 and results with scores <22 were discarded. Trafficked pangolins can carry coronaviruses closely related to These shy, quirky but cute mammals are one of the most heavily trafficked yet least understood animals in the world. and X.J. Five example sequences with incongruent phylogenetic positions in the two trees are indicated by dashed lines. Pangolins: What are they and why are they linked to Covid-19? - Inverse When the genomic data included both coding and non-coding regions we used a single GTR+ substitution model; for concatenated coding genes we partitioned the alignment by codon position and specified an independent GTR+ model for each partition with a separate gamma model to accommodate inter-site rate variation. Split diversity in constrained conservation prioritization using integer linear programming. Among the 68sequences in the aligned sarbecovirus sequence set, 67 show evidence of mosaicism (all DunnSidak-corrected P<4104 and 3SEQ14), indicating involvement in homologous recombination either directly with identifiable parentals or in their deeper shared evolutionary historythat is, due to shared ancestral recombination events. For weather, science, and COVID-19 . Allen O'Brien on LinkedIn: #r #rstudio #rstats #pangolin #covid19 # Pangolins may have incubated the novel coronavirus, gene study shows Means and 95% HPD intervals are 0.080 [0.0580.101] and 0.530 [0.3040.780] for the patristic distances between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 (green) and 0.143 [0.1090.180] and 0.154 [0.0930.231] for the patristic distances between SARS-CoV-2 and Pangolin 2019 (orange). There is a 90% DNA match between SARS CoV 2 and a coronavirus in pangolins. Posterior distributions were approximated through Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, which were run sufficiently long to ensure effective sampling sizes >100. 4), but also by markedly different evolutionary rates. Holmes, E. C., Rambaut, A. Uncertainty measures are shown in Extended Data Fig. After removal of A1 and A4, we named the new region A. Don't blame pangolins, coronavirus family tree tracing could prove key Bayesian evaluation of temporal signal in measurably evolving populations. 4 we compare these divergence time estimates to those obtained using the MERS-CoV-centred rate priors for NRR1, NRR2 and NRA3. RegionB showed no PI signals within the region, except one including sequence SC2018 (Sichuan), and thus this sequence was also removed from the set. Collectively our analyses point to bats being the primary reservoir for the SARS-CoV-2 lineage. In such cases, even moderate rate variation among long, deep phylogenetic branches will substantially impact expected root-to-tip divergences over a sampling time range that represents only a small fraction of the evolutionary history40. 110. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. master 4 branches 94 tags Code AngieHinrichs Add entries for pangolin-data/-assignment 1.18.1.1 ( #512) ad16752 4 days ago 990 commits .github/ workflows Update pangolin.yml 7 months ago docs docs need guide tree now 3 years ago pangolin This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository. 26 March 2020. The relatively fast evolutionary rate means that it is most appropriate to estimate shallow nodes in the sarbecovirus evolutionary history. J. Virol. Sarbecovirus, HCoV-OC43 and SARS-CoV data were assembled from GenBank to be as complete as possible, with sampling year as an inclusion criterion. covid19_mostefai2021_paper/01_CreateObjects.r at master HussinLab Google Scholar. With horseshoe bats currently the most plausible origin of SARS-CoV-2, it is important to consider that sarbecoviruses circulate in a variety of horseshoe bat species with widely overlapping species ranges57. Trends Microbiol. Biol. Subsequently a bat sarbecovirusRaTG13, sampled from a Rhinolophus affinis horseshoe bat in 2013 in Yunnan Provincewas reported that clusters with SARS-CoV-2 in almost all genomic regions with approximately 96% genome sequence identity2. CAS J. Virol. 31922087). A phylogenetic treeusing RAxML v8.2.8 (ref. Publishers note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Google Scholar. Conducting analogous analyses of codon usage bias as Ji et al. The estimated divergence times for the pangolin virus most closely related to the SARS-CoV-2/RaTG13 lineage range from 1851 (1730-1958) to 1877 (1746-1986), indicating that these pangolin . Since the release of Version 2.0 in July 2020, however, it has used the 'pangoLEARN' machine-learning-based assignment algorithm to assign lineages to new SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Zhou, P. et al. PubMed Central USA 113, 30483053 (2016). performed recombination analysis for non-recombining regions1 and 2, breakpoint analysis and phylogenetic inference on recombinant segments. To examine temporal signal in the sequenced data, we plotted root-to-tip divergence against sampling time using TempEst39 v.1.5.3 based on a maximum likelihood tree. 206298/Z/17/Z. =0.00075 and one with a mean of 0.00024 and s.d. These are in general agreement with estimates using NRR2 and NRA3, which result in divergence times of 1982 (19482009) and 1948 (18791999), respectively, for SARS-CoV-2, and estimates of 1952 (19061989) and 1970 (19321996), respectively, for the divergence time of SARS-CoV from its closest known bat relative. Abstract. Consistent with this, we estimate a concomitantly decreasing non-synonymous-to-synonymous substitution rate ratio over longer evolutionary timescales: 1.41 (1.20,1.68), 0.35 (0.30,0.41) and 0.133 (0.129,0.136) for SARS, MERS-CoV and HCoV-OC43, respectively. Early detection via genomics was not possible during Southeast Asias initial outbreaks of avian influenza H5N1 (1997 and 20032004) or the first SARS outbreak (20022003). Boni, M. F., de Jong, M. D., van Doorn, H. R. & Holmes, E. C. Guidelines for identifying homologous recombination events in influenza A virus. Cell 181, 223227 (2020). Since experts have suggested that pangolins may be the reservoir species for COVID-19, the scaly anteater has been catapulted into headlines, news reports, and conversationsand some are calling COVID-19 "the revenge of the . The Sichuan (SC2018) virus appears to be a recombinant of northern/central and southern viruses, while the two Zhejiang viruses (CoVZXC21 and CoVZC45) appear to carry a recombinant region from southern or central China. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. The origins we present in Fig. D.L.R. While pangolins could be acting as intermediate hosts for bat viruses to get into humansthey develop severe respiratory disease38 and commonly come into contact with people through traffickingthere is no evidence that pangolin infection is a requirement for bat viruses to cross into humans. At present, we analyzed the diversity of SARS-CoV-2 viral genomes in India to know the evolutionary patterns of viruses in the country through their pangolin lineage and GISAID-Clade. Med. 11,12,13,22,28)a signal that suggests recombinationthe divergence patterns in the Sprotein do not show evidence of recombination between the lineage leading to SARS-CoV-2 and known sarbecoviruses. Scientists defined the pangolin lineage of this variant to be B.1.1.523 and it was originally recognized as a variant under monitoring on July 14, 2021. Lond. Microbiol. Biol. Xiao, K. et al. We thank originating laboratories at South China Agricultural University (Y. Shen, L. Xiao and W. Chen; no. The red and blue boxplots represent the divergence time estimates for SARS-CoV-2 (red) and the 2002-2003 SARS-CoV (blue) from their most closely related bat virus, with the light- and dark-colored versions based on the HCoV-OC43 and MERS-CoV centered priors, respectively. 2). 6, e14 (2017). TMRCA estimates for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV from their respective most closely related bat lineages are reasonably consistent for the different data sets and different rate priors in our analyses. Lin, X. et al. Mol. The new paper finds that the genetic sequences of several strains of coronavirus found in pangolins were between 88.5 percent and 92.4 percent similar to those of the novel coronavirus. Overview of the SARS-CoV-2 genotypes circulating in Latin America performed recombination analysis for non-recombining alignment3, calibration of rate of evolution and phylogenetic reconstruction and dating. The variable-loop region in SARS-CoV-2 shows closer identity to the 2019 pangolin coronavirus sequence than to the RaTG13 bat virus, supported by phylogenetic inference (Fig. Did Pangolin Trafficking Cause the Coronavirus Pandemic? A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to - PubMed Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. In our second stage, we wanted to construct non-recombinant regions where our approach to breakpoint identification was as conservative as possible. Because 3SEQ identified ten BFRs >500nt, we used GARDs (v.2.5.0) inference on 10, 11 and 12 breakpoints. The rate of genome generation is unprecedented, yet there is currently no coherent nor accepted scheme for naming the expanding . We compiled a dataset including 27human coronavirus OC43 virus genomes and ten related animal virus genomes (six bovine, three white-tailed deer and one canine virus). Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak LINeages, The pangolin web app is maintained by the Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance. & Andersen, K. G. Pandemics: spend on surveillance, not prediction. Despite the SARS-CoV-2 lineages acquisition of residues in its Spike (S) proteins receptor-binding domain (RBD) permitting the use of human ACE2 (ref. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa163 (2020). M.F.B., P.L. When viewing the last 7kb of the genome, a clade of viruses from northern China appears to cluster with sequences from southern Chinese provinces but, when inspecting trees from different parts of ORF1ab, the N. China clade is phylogenetically separated from the S. China clade. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Green boxplots show the TMRCA estimate for the RaTG13/SARS-CoV-2 lineage and its most closely related pangolin lineage (Guangdong 2019), with the light and dark coloured version based on the HCoV-OC43 and MERS-CoV centred priors, respectively. Evol. obtained the genome sequences of 10 SARS-CoV-2 virus strains through nanopore sequencing of nasopharyngeal swabs in Malta and analyzed the assembled genome with pangolin software, and the results showed that these virus strains were assigned to B.1 lineage, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was widely spread in Europe (Biazzo et al., 2021). PureBasic 53 13 constellations Public Python 42 17 ac, Root-to-tip (RtT) divergence as a function of sampling time for the three coronavirus evolutionary histories unfolding over different timescales (HCoV-OC43 (n=37; a) MERS (n=35; b) and SARS (n=69; c)). Phylogenetic trees and exact breakpoints for all ten BFRs are shown in Supplementary Figs. Of the nine breakpoints defining these ten BFRs, four showed phylogenetic incongruence (PI) signals with bootstrap support >80%, adopting previously published criteria on using a combination of mosaic and PI signals to show evidence of past recombination events19. performed codon usage analysis. It is available as a command line tool and a web application. In regionA, we removed subregion A1 (ntpositions 3,8724,716 within regionA) and subregion A4 (nt1,6422,113) because both showed PI signals with other subregions of regionA. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide. We call this approach breakpoint-conservative, but note that this has the opposite effect to the construction of NRR1 in that this approach is the most likely to allow breakpoints to remain inside putative non-recombining regions. Evol. Combining regions A, B and C and removing the five named sequences gives us putative NRR1, as an alignment of 63sequences. Visual exploration using TempEst39 indicates that there is no evidence for temporal signal in these datasets (Extended Data Fig. Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. Now, the two researchers used genomic sequencing to compare the DNA of the new coronavirus in humans with that in animals and found a 99% match with pangolins. Evol. Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Rega Institute, Leuven, Belgium, Department of Biological Sciences, Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China, State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, Department of Biology, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK, You can also search for this author in